简爱读后感 不少于500字 急急急
发布网友
发布时间：2022-04-26 09:20
共4个回答
热心网友
时间：2022-06-26 15:28
我是自己写的.
很有感触
作者.雪晴
读《简爱》，是因为初三下学期的必读名著。不好意思地说，这是我从小到这么大读的第一本名著。
开始的时候，定下了“每天5页”的目标，当时觉得不难，而且形成计划性，读起来也可以坚持不懈。不久后超出了预定的目标，不是因为被书中的内容吸引，而是因为学习任务太繁杂，想提早完成任务。后来更加超出了“5页”的数字，一天几章、几十页，不过这次是因为书中层层迭生的悬念，令我舍不得放下书，仿佛放下了就把之前的内容忘了似的。
事实确实是这样。几次读倦了读累了不爱读了觉得浪费了时间的时候，便会把书中的内容抛在脑后，再次回忆起仿佛隔了一个世纪那么长。
所以一旦有问题，不能放在心里，必须在第一刻解决。后来在某个时刻再想起这个问题，不会感到慌乱不舒服，而是一种掌握的满足。
实话说，开始的时候被繁复的故事情节和长达500页密密麻麻的字给震住了。有时候希望马上读完，可到一半又不得不认输——这实在是需要很大的毅力。
几番周折，与故事的主人公同喜、同悲，同感受风餐露宿、美好生活。可奇怪的是，合上最后一页时，并没有觉得如何顺畅，反而背上了更加沉重的包袱。一是因为对文章结尾的把握不大清楚，这有一半是来源于我对细节的处理时太过武断，有时随便翻一页竟否认自己曾经读过；二是因为对文章略到结尾时一段话的欣赏和青睐。
说到《简爱》中比较喜欢的语句，那句“就像是我们共同来到坟墓前一样——我们都是平等的！”理所当然地入选，它是许多读过《简爱》的人的一致看法。对于这段话，只能说持中立态度，没有特别的感觉，只是简爱弱小的身躯与伟大的心灵形成了令人震撼的对比。不同版本的译文有所不同，那大概讲述的是在简爱回到罗切斯特的怀抱后，罗切斯特意外恢复一只眼睛的视力以及后来生活的一个概述，读来倍感亲切的文字，虽然极其朴实，没有华美的语句，但不知道怎的，一阵暖流涌上心来，当时的感觉第一就是看了这么多页没白看，足矣了！“上帝用慈悲来减轻了惩罚。”我想这也许就是勃朗特短暂一生唯一一本书能经得起时间的考验的原因吧！
一日浏览网页的时候，一句话猛然撞击的我的视线：除了罗切斯特，还有谁会去爱简爱？是啊，一个弱小的身躯，总是苍白的脸庞，古灵精怪的性格，再加上并不美丽、却可以称得上丑陋的脸，能征服如此具有贵族气质的罗切斯特，着实夸大了事物的本质。这也从另一个角度反映出，伟大的精神力量能战胜一切。
写简爱读后，不是谁谁要求，不是假期作业，而是读完后的的确确的第一想法。《简爱》，初一的时候就把它捧回家中，直到现在才有能力理解一部分的内涵，不禁慨叹，对世界传统名著所见甚少啊！简爱，简单爱，她的爱不简单，但她的心灵很简单，用自己的努力、奋斗打造属于自己的天空。理智，思想，使她逐渐成长为一个美好的人。
故事总是以美好结束，这样的结尾千篇一律，但从来不会厌倦。也许如果哪一次结局是悲惨的，我们还会对故事感到抱怨、痛楚，甚至讨厌。因为人心的美，是永恒的，就像简爱那样。
真的是原创.昨天刚写的
今天就派上用场
后来很喜欢这本书了，
所以迫不及待的写下来了
热心网友
时间：2022-06-26 15:29
The Independent Spirit——about“ Jane Eyer”
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s ecation in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of procing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be e to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. Inbitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.
热心网友
时间：2022-06-26 15:29
简爱》读后感
《简爱》是一本具有多年历史的文学著作。至今已152年的历史了。它的成功在于它详细的内容，精彩的片段。在译序中，它还详细地介绍了《简爱》的作者一些背景故事。 从中我了解到了作者夏洛蒂．勃郎特的许多事。她出生在一个年经济困顿、多灾多难的家庭；居住在一个远离尘器的穷乡僻壤；生活在*势头正健，国家由农民向工业国过渡，新兴资产阶级日益壮大的时代，这些都给她的小说创作上打上了可见的烙印。 可惜，上帝似乎毫不吝啬的塑造了这个天才们。有似乎急不可耐伸出了毁灭之手。这些才华横溢的儿女，都无一例外的先于父亲再人生的黄金时间离开了人间。惜乎，勃郎特姐妹！ 《简爱》这本小说，主要通过简.爱与罗切斯特之间一波三折的爱情故事，塑造了一个出生低微、生活道路曲折，却始终坚持维护人格、追求个性自由、主张人生平等、不向人生低头的坚强女性。 简.爱生存在一个父母双亡，寄人篱下的环境。从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇：姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打......然而，她并没有绝望，她并没有自我摧毁，并没有在侮辱中沉沦.所带来的种种不幸的一切，相反，换回的却是简.爱的无限信心，却是简.爱的坚强不屈的精神，一种可战胜的内在人格力量. 不幸，在学习生活中，简.爱仍然是承受着肉体上的受罚和心灵上的催残.学校的施主罗可赫斯特不但当着全校师生的面诋毁她，而且把她置于耻辱台上示众.使她在全校师生面前丢尽了脸.但简.爱仍坚强不屈，化悲愤为力量，不但在学习上飞速进步，而且也取得了师生们的理解. 不久，简.爱又陷入了爱情的旋涡.个性及强的她同样保持着个人高贵的尊严，在情敌面前显得大家闺秀，毫不逊色，对于英格拉姆小姐的咄咄*人，她从容面对. 同样， 在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师，而感到自卑，她认为他们是平等的.不应该因为她是仆人，而不能受到别人的尊重.也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染。使得罗切斯特感到自惭性秽，同时对她肃然起敬，并深深地爱上了她。他的真心，让她感动，她接受了他.后来，简.爱发现罗切斯特已有了妻子，她的自尊自重再次出现，毫不犹豫地离开了他，她对爱情的专一，让我敬佩. 最后，简.爱得知，罗切斯特为了拯救在活中的妻子不幸双目失明.躯体严重残疾，完全丧失了生活能力，而同时又妻亡财毁.简.爱全身心的爱再次投入了他的怀抱...... 从这本书中，可以看出它塑造了一个体现新兴阶级的某些要求的女性形象，刻画了工业*时期的时代精神。
热心网友
时间：2022-06-26 15:30
《简爱》是一部带有自转色彩的小说，它告诉人们一个人生的真谛。
《简爱》的作者夏洛蒂勃朗特温柔，清纯，喜欢追求一些美好的东西，尽管她家境贫穷，从小失去了母爱，再加上她身材矮小，容貌不出众，但也许就是这样一种灵魂深处的自卑，反映在她的性格上就是一种非常敏感的自尊。她描写的简爱也是一个不美的，矮小的女人，但是她有着极其强烈的自尊心。
简爱生存在一个寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打......也许正是因为这一切，换回了简爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的性格，一种可战胜的内在人格力量. 她坚定不移地去追求一种光明的，圣洁的，美好的生活。
在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑，反而认为他们是平等的。也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染，使得罗切斯特为之震撼，并把她看作了一个可以和自己在精神上平等交谈的人，并且深深爱上了她。
而当他们结婚的那一天，简爱知道了罗切斯特已有妻子时，她觉得自己必须要离开，她虽然讲，“我要遵从上帝颁发世人认可的法律，我要坚守住我在清醒时而不是像现在这样疯狂时所接受的原则”。但是从内心讲，更深一层的是简爱意识到自己受到了欺骗，她的自尊心受到了戏弄，因为她深爱着罗切斯特。但简爱做出了一个非常理性的决定。在这样一种爱情力量包围之下，在富裕的生活*之下，她依然要坚持自己作为个人的尊严，这是简爱最具有精神魅力的地方。
小说设计了一个很光明的结尾－－虽然罗切斯特的庄园毁了，他自己也成了一个残废，但正是这样一个条件，使简爱不再在尊严与爱之间矛盾，而同时获得自己的尊严和真爱。
在当今社会，人们都疯狂地为了金钱和地位而淹没爱情。在穷与富之间选择富，而在爱与不爱之间选择不爱。很少有人会像简爱这样为爱情为人格抛弃所有，而且义无反顾。《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种返朴归真，是一种追求全心付出的爱情，还有作为一个人应有的尊严。它犹如一杯冰水，净化每一个人的心灵。
